PSAT Linear Inequalities: At Least, At Most, and Limits
Translate PSAT inequality word problems, handle negative division, and choose valid whole-number limits with original worked examples and practice.
For a linear-inequality word problem, define the unknown, translate the limit, and solve while keeping the same set of allowed values. Reverse the inequality when multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative number. If the unknown counts objects, finish by checking which whole numbers satisfy the original limit.
College Board’s Assessment Framework for the Digital SAT Suite includes linear inequalities in the PSAT/NMSQT Algebra domain. This guide focuses on one-variable problems. Every example below is original; the prices and situations are hypothetical, with no extra taxes or fees.
Decide whether the boundary is allowed
Use this table when a quantity is compared with . Ask whether exactly would satisfy the sentence before choosing the symbol.
| Words | Inequality | Is the boundary allowed? |
|---|---|---|
| At least; no fewer than; a minimum of | Yes | |
| At most; no more than; a maximum of | Yes | |
| More than; greater than | No | |
| Fewer than; less than | No |
Write the whole quantity being limited on one side. In a budget problem, that usually means total cost, including any fixed charge. Label the variable with its units and decide whether it can be fractional.
A maximum: how many kits fit the budget?
A school club has $ for a workshop. There is an $ setup charge and each kit costs $. What is the greatest number of complete kits the club can buy?
Let be the number of kits, a nonnegative whole number. Total cost must be no more than dollars.
Subtract from both sides, then divide by positive . The inequality keeps its direction: , so .
Since lies between and , the greatest allowed whole number is . Check both the proposed maximum and the next count:
- Ten kits cost dollars, within the budget.
- Eleven kits cost dollars, exceeding the budget.
The model permits whole-number counts from through , and the question asks for the greatest. Rounding the fractional boundary to the nearest whole number would give , which fails the original condition.
A minimum: how many tickets reach the target?
A club has already collected $ and receives $ for each additional ticket sold. It wants to collect at least $ in total. What is the smallest number of additional tickets it must sell?
Let count additional tickets. The model is . Subtracting and dividing by gives:
The smallest allowed whole number is . Selling tickets gives dollars, below the target. Selling gives dollars, which reaches it.
The kit problem and ticket problem require different choices at a fractional boundary. Choose the whole number that still satisfies the inequality. OpenStax’s applications lesson explains why context determines that choice.
Reverse the sign when dividing by a negative
Solve for real values of . Subtract from both sides to get . Dividing both sides by reverses the inequality:
Check in the original expression: gives , while gives , which is false. The boundary gives , also false, so it is excluded.
Why does the direction reverse? Start with . Multiplying both sides by produces , because the order of the two numbers reverses. The operation is explained in OpenStax’s linear-inequality lesson.
Simply getting negative numbers does not trigger a reversal. Subtracting from both sides of gives , with the same direction. The trigger is multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative quantity.
If keeping operations balanced is still difficult, work through the linear-equation guide first, then apply the additional sign rule here.
Two limits must hold at the same time
A display needs at least but no more than cards. A student already has cards and can add full packs of , using every card in each pack. Which numbers of packs are allowed?
Let be the nonnegative whole number of packs. Both limits apply to the total, :
Subtract from all three parts, then divide every part by positive . This gives , then .
Because , the allowed pack counts are . Four packs give cards and seven packs give ; three give only , and eight give .
The answer must satisfy both limits. Finding a count that meets the minimum is only part of the check.
A short check before you submit
- Meaning: Does the inequality match the quantity and limit in the sentence?
- Equality: Does the wording allow the boundary itself?
- Operations: Did you reverse the direction exactly when multiplying or dividing by a negative?
- Context: Is the result an allowed count or measurement? For a whole-number minimum or maximum, check the adjacent count too.
Try four original questions
- An order has a $ delivery charge plus $ per notebook. With a budget of $, what is the maximum number of whole notebooks you can order?
- A team has bottles and needs at least . New bottles come in cases of . What is the minimum number of full cases to buy?
- Solve for real values of . Is the boundary included?
- A drawer contains stickers. You add complete bundles of stickers and want fewer than stickers in the drawer. What is the maximum number of bundles you can add?
Show answers and boundary checks
- notebooks. From , get . Eleven cost dollars; twelve cost , exceeding the budget.
- cases. From , get . Eight cases bring the total to ; nine bring it to .
- . Subtract to get , then divide by and reverse the sign. The boundary is included because . As another check, gives , while gives , which is false.
- bundles. From , get . Six bundles give stickers. Seven give exactly , which is not fewer than . Here the boundary is already a whole number, so checking whether equality is allowed matters.
When an answer fails, record whether the problem was translating the words, handling a negative divisor, including the boundary, or choosing a whole number. The practice error-log template helps turn that observation into a specific correction.
Try a free PSAT practice question with Kibo when you are ready to continue.
Prepared with AI assistance. Original examples were checked with separate calculations; no human review is claimed. Sources checked October 26, 2026. Kibo is not affiliated with or endorsed by College Board or National Merit Scholarship Corporation.